Wednesday, June 1, 2011



While doing research on a British university I hope to attend next fall, I came across an article on the top African universities. Apparently, only two African universities, one in Egypt and the other in South Africa, made it to the Times Higher Education World Rankings list for 2011. The article goes on to suggest that African universities should focus on developing their respective communities, rather than devote vital resources to a somewhat futile cause.

The author lists many challenges that the African continent and by extension, African universities, face. The oft-recited list includes poverty, the history of colonialism and ethnic diversity. However while I have been a proponent of this view in the past (and still am at times), I worry that these challenges are becoming excuses. Yes, poverty and colonialism are problematic, but rather than continuing to lament over our situation we should begin to think of unique and effective solutions to our problems!

Furthermore, the article seems to imply that community development and international recognition (by virtue of rankings) are (and maybe even, should be ) at polar opposites of the African priority list. I’ll admit that rankings can be shallow, but I know I am not the only one who is tired of seeing Africa finish last. While I certainly agree that a focus on community development is essential, the situation seems to raise the question: what is the use of doing good if no one can see it? Clearly, the answer is complicated since the question itself raises several moral concerns. Nonetheless, I believe that in our modern world visibility is vital. High visibility of the work of African universities will quite likely attract much needed funding and talented scholars, both as professors and students. This would no doubt reverse the brain drain that the article so eloquently discusses. Most importantly, the increased physical and social capital will allow the universities to be even more effective in their endeavors to develop their respective countries and local communities.

The article also suggests that a focus on rankings will be a waste of resources. However, the methodology of the report seems to give the most weight to factors that should have minimal cost implications. (The categories teaching, research and citations make up ninety percent of the overall score.) In addition, these factors regardless of cost would certainly improve the quality of African education and overall effectiveness.

To suggest that international rankings are of little import, is to ignore the various cause and effect relationships. That being said, by no means do I suggest that African universities should begin to channel 100 percent of their resources into becoming number one on this and any other ranking list. I only desire to see more African universities receive the recognition that they deserve. Perhaps such positive publicity will be just what the continent needs…

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

In Referendum

Last week, voters from Southern Sudan turned out in great numbers to decide whether they should split from the mostly Muslim, Arab majority in the North. For the most part, this page of the story is old news. Major international media outlets have been talking about the vote for months and the referendum itself was stipulated by a 2005 peace agreement. Like most people, I am extremely pleased that the referendum and the drive for secession have been relatively successful and, most importantly, peaceful.

Although I celebrate freedom with the people of Southern Sudan, a part of me is still concerned. I wonder what this secession means for the state of affairs on the African continent. I am aware of the many civil conflicts that have existed in Sudan. From the twenty-year civil war to Darfur and the discovery of oil in Abyei, the problems are, indeed, numerous. Yet, despite the tensions in various parts of Sudan, I still can't help but wonder if secession is really the solution. I am worried about what this says about the African continent and the world community, in general. Does secession really solve the underlying issues? Does the animosity disappear once a group of people get autonomy of their own country? Will it all get better when an imaginary line demarks the Sudanese people as neighbors and no longer countrymen and women? Should we forget about the "global community" and separate back into our comfortable little units because we are all so different and often do not get along? In that case, watch out world, who is going to be next?

On one hand, I'll be the first person to tell you that the current boundaries and conception of nationhood, particularly in Africa, are a product of colonialism... a figment of Western imagination. In this regard, why not scrap all the borders and redesign them as we see fit? Yet, on the other hand, when I envision new borders I have always seen it as an act of unity. Perhaps, a way to reunite tribes and ethnic groups that were carelessly separated in the "Scramble. "

From another point of view, it is clear that the people of Southern Sudan are desperate for their independence. Preliminary results from the poll indicate that well over ninety percent of voters are in favor of the secession. Should my lofty dreams of a united Africa interfere with the right of self-determination? Probably not. Furthermore, with such a united front from the Southern Sudanese people, an interference with this dream almost come true would probably launch the country back into a civil war anyway.

So, what is the solution? Unfortunately, I do not know. I am unsure if anyone does. I only hope that time will gift us with what most of us ultimately desire... PEACE!


Best wishes to the people of Sudan.

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

The Year of Love


Happy New Year, everyone!

I have been thinking a lot on religion and have decided to declare 2011 my personal year of LOVE. It seems that we have so many churches and not enough people who are truly engaged with God's word. I have always loved the phrase "What Would Jesus Do" because it reminds those who profess to be Christians to follow CHRIST's example. While Christians have a detailed list of activities that are classified "sin," we are reminded by Christ that we should never cast anybody aside. We are not called to judge the world but to be the LIGHT. Lead by example! If your faith is what you profess it is, people should be changed by the distinction of your life. We should incline people to our beliefs with love and not with harsh words and the power of the sword.

Regardless of your faith or beliefs, I think there is room for a little more love in all of our lives. We should all remember to give to those who are truly needy, to accept those who are different, and to exhibit our best selves. Here's to a HAPPY, PEACEFUL, and PROSPEROUS New Year!

For God is Love...1 John 4:7-21


Tuesday, December 21, 2010



You see them everywhere! From TWAs to huge Afros. Twists. Twist-outs. Coils. And even sometimes just a bit of hair poking out from under a protective style. The natural hair movement is in full swing. Some say it's a fad and others a way of life. Regardless of which camp is right, I am happy to see so many Black women exploring their God-given hair texture.

I "went natural" before it was popular and I still remember the side-eyes and disturbing comments from friends, family and foes alike. Since I've blogged about my hair before (see here and here), I'll just say that natural hair has truly been a journey for me. I've gone from being a naive and curious fourteen year old girl to a women who knows that au naturale is the only way for her. That being said, I am not (as is commonly suggested) anti-relaxer. I AM, however, anti-western cultural hegemony, anti-low self esteem in Black women, anti self-degradation and anti denial.

Getting back to the revolution, I realized it took off when I walked into Target specifically to buy natural hair care products. While the news of Target's new "multiethnic"products has been going around the blogosphere for months, it didn't really click, until I walked in and saw several brands of natural hair care products stocked right there in between Pantene and African Pride (pride my foot, hmph!). The offerings include the very popular Miss Jessie's line, CURLS, The Jane Carter Solution, and SheaMositure. It was nice to have so many in-store options and I finally settled with the CURLS products (which I will review on my hair blog (http://thedyasporanknapsack.tumblr.com/).

I can only hope that the natural hair movement continues to gain momentum and that Black women around the world will leave behind the world of imitation and embrace their own unique beauty. Imitators can only and forever be second best. The revolution is HERE: get in or get out!


Wednesday, December 15, 2010



The plans for a light rail system in Lagos, Nigeria are finally taking off. Although the project has been in the works for over thirty years, it has remained a distant dream until much recently. As one of the largest cities in Africa, traffic flow has been a major problem in Lagos for decades. The Lagos Bus Rapid Transit (Lagos BRT), which was introduced in 2008, has helped to alleviate the traffic issue but the congestion is still overwhelming for many Lagosians.

The proposed line is expected to cover over 35 kilometeres with the Red line running between Agbado and Marina and the Blue line starting in Okokomaiko and also terminating in Marina.
The rail line is expected to be completed in about three years.

For more information visit:



Sunday, November 7, 2010





It's 4pm on a Monday afternoon and I'm sitting in a class I've been eagerly looking forward to since the moment I registered for the Spring in NY program. The room is filled with New York University students and I am the only domestic exchange student and one of four people of color. While this is a far cry from my home institution, Spelman College, my excitement can not be abated. We begin to discuss the material for the day and we get into a discussion about ethnic differences. As the only Black African in the class, I feel obliged to contribute my "two cents." I raise my hand and suggest that the ties that Africans feel to their tribe/ethnic heritage are quite different from the understanding of ethnicity ascribed to by people in the Western world. I go on to explain my reasoning. I suggest that tribal identification is not simply a language and culture as, say, it is when I say I am French, but also includes a worldview of its own-a religion, a way of dressing, customs, and so on. Taiye Tuakli-Wosornu briefly alludes to this uniqueness when she says "to ‘be’ Nigerian is to belong to a passionate nation; to be Yoruba, to be heir to a spiritual depth." In short, my understanding is that the differences in culture between French and English are not as defined and "taken to heart" as the differences between, say, Igbo and Yoruba.Since the class is about independence and the transition from colonial rule in Africa, I tie my comment back to the overall theme of the class and allude to the fact that this may be a cause of the many civil wars in Africa. In my opinion, the comment is valid and not so out of the ordinary. Yet, to my surprise, it appears that the class has stopped breathing. I have rocked the worlds of my "liberal" classmates. In that brief moment, a student turns to me and bursts out "you're ETHNOCENTRIC." I instantly recoil. On one hand, I am silently thanking God for my late grandfather who taught me the meaning of that word and on the other, I am seething. I can't decide which expression to put on my face. I am hurt, angry, and confused. As far as I can tell, this girl has just insinuated that I am a racist. I am offended on so many levels and convinced that I must have been misunderstood! I am NOT opining that African is "BETTER" than any other ethnic identity. Neither am I saying that deep ethnic allegiances are an excuse or justification for ethnic violence (absolutely not!). I am simply stating what to me is a fact: that Africans, an in particular Nigerians, take their ethnic identities VERY seriously and in a way that most Westerners can NOT even begin to identify with, let alone understand.

While this experience occurred almost nine months ago, the feeling of having my tail cut off has not left me. I keep wondering what it is that I said wrong. What exactly offended this girl so much that she would attach such a label to me? I regret not asking that. I regret not stopping the class then and there until the air had been cleared. I regret it because now I will probably never know. The good news, though, is that as I sit here and reflect I can still stand by what I said. I am not sure why but Africans tend to associate strongly with their ethnic group, often more closely to ethnic identity than national identity. What true "ethnocentrists" term as primitive in Africa is merely the retaining of tradition. In other words, much of modern African culture has its roots in the practices of the ancients, so to speak. These practices vary greatly from group to group and something as insignificant as a naming ceremony can distinguish one tribe from another.

That being said,I think my classmate made an error that is not unique. Many people confuse racial/ethnic pride with SUPREMACY. The fact that I am proud of being Black, Nigerian and Yoruba does not take anything away from who someone else is. The problem comes in when someone uses a difference to justify an action. Ironically, the more I think about it the more I realize that my classmate's anger only served to buttress my point. She doesn't understand. She can't. She doesn't know the values that have been imbibed in me from the moment I took my first breath. She doesn't realize that I have been taught to greet my elders on my knees, while my best friend from Edo State has been taught that is an abomination to bow to anything other than God. She doesn't understand how that influences our thought. How that makes us different. How that's OKAY. She thinks that to be liberal, is to be accepting and to be accepting means an erasure of anything that makes us different. To people like her, diversity is a paradox, of sorts. We value people for their unique experiences, and then critique them for expressing what it is that makes them unique. Maybe that's why we need more people of color in international development discourse, but that's a topic for another post.......




Tuesday, August 3, 2010




Born to a Nigerian father and an African-American mother, Dawn Okoro is an artist whose projects include paintings in oil, acrylic and pencil. Her work is inspired by her interest in the fashion industry and some of her celebrity clients include Shaun Robinson and Erykah Badu. A Chicago native, her work has been exhibited in Harlem, Chicago and London.


In addition to her skills as an artist, Ms. Okoro holds a Bachelor's degree from the University of Texas and a Juris Doctor from Texas Southern. She is one talented lady!


Her work can be purchased in person or by emailing her at info@dawnokoro.com



Visit her website at:http://www.dawnokoro.com/



Thursday, July 29, 2010


Am I the only one who is amused by Former Military President Ibrahim Babangida's (a.k.a IBB's) aspirations to become the next democratically elected president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria? I mean really! So far, the 2011 elections seem somewhat of a joke...

I'll be the first person to admit that my knowledge of Nigerian history is lacking in some areas. I did not grow up in Nigeria and most of what I know is from personal research or hearsay. That being said, "Babangida" is one of those names that really rings a bell in Nigerian politics. Growing up, we knew the two infamous dictators were Babangida and Abacha. I mean, my mom (as well as the rest of the country) came home dancing and singing when Abacha died. So for Babangida's name to be tied to Abacha's you know it's not good. Even my younger brother who is far less informed about Nigerian politics than I, asked "isn't that the bad guy?" when he heard Babangida is running.




To add to this delight, Babangida is now seeking the inclusion of Nigerians in the diaspora in the electoral process (see HERE). I don't know but it surely sounds like someone is trying to butter up the ballot box. As a second-generation Nigerian (and proud holder of a green passport), I admit that I personally would enjoy the privilege of voting. However, not if that will give someone like IBB the chance to orchestrate and manipulate the vote.

I am all for second chances, but not when it comes to something as momentous as running a country. Nigeria is already in a frail state what with the violence in Jos, high (& highly visible) corruption, and economic mismanagement.

I love my country, Nigeria, and I dream big things for the entire African continent in the next 50 years. IBB should do us all a favor: return peacefully to his "retirement" and be grateful no one has prosecuted him.

Apparently, I'm not the only one who thinks so......... ;)






Tuesday, April 27, 2010


In
"Ending the Slavery Blame Game", (New York Times Op-Ed, April 23), Dr. Henry Louis Gates Jr., discusses his belief that the role of Africans in the slave trade complicates the issue of reparations for descendants of American slaves. His basic argument seems to imply that because some Africans took an active role in the slave trade, advocates of reparations in the United States (and elsewhere) stand on shaky ground.


Gates claims that there is "very little discussion of the role Africans themselves played." In fact, throughout the article his words indicate that he believes that the role Africans played in the slave trade is a novel discovery. While I disagree, I admire Dr. Gates for attempting to engage this topic. It's a very painful realization. I first learned of African involvement in the slave trade in the latter part of my elementary school years. I still remember sitting at my desk and feeling that my world had been shattered. Everything that I had ever learned about slavery was turned upside-down. As the daughter of African immigrants, I know longer felt entitled to my righteous indignation. In fact, the idea that Africans enslaved other Africans is a concept that still baffles and perplexes me. Yet, there is nothing new about African elite (and elites, in general) exploiting their citizens and neighbors. The same structure stands as an obstacle to African development today. Regardless of it's novelty, I don't believe that it matters.

Dr. Gates's discussion of the African role completely misses the point. He notes that "slavery was a business, highly organized and lucrative for European buyers and African sellers alike." He later adds that "the conquest and capture of Africans and their sale to Europeans was one of the main sources of foreign exchange for several African kingdoms ." But how lucrative was it for these African rulers? How much did they really gain? While Gates's attempts to denounce the idea that Africans were ignorant, I still can't help but wonder. If these kingdoms flourished because of the slave trade, then where are they today? This past weekend I visited some friends in Philadelphia. It was my first time visiting this city and as we walked through we discussed which parts must have been built by slaves. The sheer amount became so overwhelming that we eventually concluded that the conversation was futile since all of America was essentially built by slaves. I say this to point out that the American economy was established because of the slave trade. No African country has this claim.

Gates points out that "the culpability of American plantation owners neither erases nor supplants that of the African slavers." The reverse is also true. The African role in the slave trade does not remove America from its duty (as this type of discussion often tries to do). It was Americans, not Africans, who separated families, whipped slaves into obedience and committed some of the gravest human rights violations the world has ever seen. It was an American who gained prominence by immorally testing his medicine on enslaved women. It was Americans who enacted Jim Crow laws and harassed, beat and/or killed people like Charles Person and Emmet Till.

That being said, Gates does allude to one important point. Acknowledging the complicity of different actors is essential to healing. At the end of the day, that's what this is all about. All parties should acknowledge AND apologize for their role in the slave trade. This is especially critical for African countries, as we attempt to engage others of African descent around the world. We can not cry for Pan-Africanism, while we sweep past atrocities under the rug.

At the end of the day, I don't believe that the issue of reparations in the United States has anything to do with the African slavers. If it did, Affirmative Action would be redundant. Gates gets it wrong when he suggests that reparations are about attributing blame. It's NOT, it's about justice! Honestly, I do not understand why this issue is so polarizing. African-Americans are not the first people to seek reparations. There have been success stories! What makes the African-American situation so new, "unworkable" and "impractical? " Although I'm classified as African-American, I don't believe that I, or anyone like me, should be eligible for reparations. While I was born in the United States, I am not a descendant of slaves. The people who are, are entitled to the unpaid wages of their ancestors, and the American government has a moral duty to pay. It's as simple as that.


Monday, April 19, 2010




Welcome to Nigeria happened to be one of the top trending topics on Twitter last week Thursday. For those not familiar with Twitter, "trending topics" are the most popular/ most discussed topics on Twitter at a given moment. It was pretty random because nothing particularly special was happening in Nigeria, except for maybe BBC's new documentary Welcome to Lagos.Usually trending topics are about major current events that affect a broad range of people, so for "Welcome to Nigeria" to have been one of the top ten topics for almost 24 hours was a pretty big deal. At first, I was excited because it seemed like an amazing PR opportunity. Nigeria has a pretty bad rep in the international community and this was the time for young Nigerians all around the globe to shed some light on what makes Nigeria so special.

I just did a quick search on the hashtag #WelcometoNigeria to see how popular trending services defined the topic.

Whatthetrend.com explained it as:
People are introducing Nigeria to the world and tweeting things that are unique to Nigeria.

Tagdef.com noted:
people are writing advertisments for Nigeria

Identi.ca:
People are introducing Nigeria/Nigerians to the world..."with random jokes".

All sounds pretty good, right?

Unfortunately, it didin't pan out quite that way. If that was how Nigerians introduced themselves, then it was a fairly horrible introduction. At first, it was all harmless fun and jokes but then it got messy. The majority of the tweets by Nigerians were negative and while many of them were true, Twitter may not have been the best place to voice these complaints. Twitter is accessed by MILLIONS of people around the world, many of whom no little to nothing about Africa, let alone Nigeria. This became apparent when many non-Nigerians began to send messages about Nigeria being the homes of AIDS and African Booty-scratchers. Sadly, these were often from other people of African descent. Things got even sadder when people began to air their tribalist/racist and all around discriminatory views.

In short, as a Nigerian and avid Pan-Africanist, I was pretty disappointed. There were a few positive spots and I was happy that I wasn't the only one who noticed the excessive negativity. So far, the experiment of using social media as a tool to change perception has been a failure. If Nigerians think so negatively of themselves, how can they expect others to think any better? The whole charade was a major eye-opener for me. There's work to be done......


;;