Tales of hunting will always glorify the hunter until the lioness is her own historian! — Igbo Proverb
While doing research on a British university I hope to attend next fall, I came across an article on the top African universities. Apparently, only two African universities, one in Egypt and the other in South Africa, made it to the Times Higher Education World Rankings list for 2011. The article goes on to suggest that African universities should focus on developing their respective communities, rather than devote vital resources to a somewhat futile cause. The author lists many challenges that the African continent and by extension, African universities, face. The oft-recited list includes poverty, the history of colonialism and ethnic diversity. However while I have been a proponent of this view in the past (and still am at times), I worry that these challenges are becoming excuses. Yes, poverty and colonialism are problematic, but rather than continuing to lament over our situation we should begin to think of unique and effective solutions to our problems! Furthermore, the article seems to imply that community development and international recognition (by virtue of rankings) are (and maybe even, should be ) at polar opposites of the African priority list. I’ll admit that rankings can be shallow, but I know I am not the only one who is tired of seeing Africa finish last. While I certainly agree that a focus on community development is essential, the situation seems to raise the question: what is the use of doing good if no one can see it? Clearly, the answer is complicated since the question itself raises several moral concerns. Nonetheless, I believe that in our modern world visibility is vital. High visibility of the work of African universities will quite likely attract much needed funding and talented scholars, both as professors and students. This would no doubt reverse the brain drain that the article so eloquently discusses. Most importantly, the increased physical and social capital will allow the universities to be even more effective in their endeavors to develop their respective countries and local communities. The article also suggests that a focus on rankings will be a waste of resources. However, the methodology of the report seems to give the most weight to factors that should have minimal cost implications. (The categories teaching, research and citations make up ninety percent of the overall score.) In addition, these factors regardless of cost would certainly improve the quality of African education and overall effectiveness. To suggest that international rankings are of little import, is to ignore the various cause and effect relationships. That being said, by no means do I suggest that African universities should begin to channel 100 percent of their resources into becoming number one on this and any other ranking list. I only desire to see more African universities receive the recognition that they deserve. Perhaps such positive publicity will be just what the continent needs…
Last week, voters from Southern Sudan turned out in great numbers to decide whether they should split from the mostly Muslim, Arab majority in the North. For the most part, this page of the story is old news. Major international media outlets have been talking about the vote for months and the referendum itself was stipulated by a 2005 peace agreement. Like most people, I am extremely pleased that the referendum and the drive for secession have been relatively successful and, most importantly, peaceful.
Although I celebrate freedom with the people of Southern Sudan, a part of me is still concerned. I wonder what this secession means for the state of affairs on the African continent. I am aware of the many civil conflicts that have existed in Sudan. From the twenty-year civil war to Darfur and the discovery of oil in Abyei, the problems are, indeed, numerous. Yet, despite the tensions in various parts of Sudan, I still can't help but wonder if secession is really the solution. I am worried about what this says about the African continent and the world community, in general. Does secession really solve the underlying issues? Does the animosity disappear once a group of people get autonomy of their own country? Will it all get better when an imaginary line demarks the Sudanese people as neighbors and no longer countrymen and women? Should we forget about the "global community" and separate back into our comfortable little units because we are all so different and often do not get along? In that case, watch out world, who is going to be next?
On one hand, I'll be the first person to tell you that the current boundaries and conception of nationhood, particularly in Africa, are a product of colonialism... a figment of Western imagination. In this regard, why not scrap all the borders and redesign them as we see fit? Yet, on the other hand, when I envision new borders I have always seen it as an act of unity. Perhaps, a way to reunite tribes and ethnic groups that were carelessly separated in the "Scramble. "
From another point of view, it is clear that the people of Southern Sudan are desperate for their independence. Preliminary results from the poll indicate that well over ninety percent of voters are in favor of the secession. Should my lofty dreams of a united Africa interfere with the right of self-determination? Probably not. Furthermore, with such a united front from the Southern Sudanese people, an interference with this dream almost come true would probably launch the country back into a civil war anyway.
So, what is the solution? Unfortunately, I do not know. I am unsure if anyone does. I only hope that time will gift us with what most of us ultimately desire... PEACE!
Best wishes to the people of Sudan.

Labels: African America, hair

Labels: Africa, development, Nigeria, Transportation




Am I the only one who is amused by Former Military President Ibrahim Babangida's (a.k.a IBB's) aspirations to become the next democratically elected president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria? I mean really! So far, the 2011 elections seem somewhat of a joke...

In "Ending the Slavery Blame Game", (New York Times Op-Ed, April 23), Dr. Henry Louis Gates Jr., discusses his belief that the role of Africans in the slave trade complicates the issue of reparations for descendants of American slaves. His basic argument seems to imply that because some Africans took an active role in the slave trade, advocates of reparations in the United States (and elsewhere) stand on shaky ground.
Labels: African America, reparations, slavery

Labels: Nigeria, perception, twitter